WH16NS40 Flasher

Discussion of LibreDrive mode, compatible drives and firmwares
husbeard
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2020 7:11 pm

Re: WH16NS40 Flasher

Post by husbeard » Wed Sep 16, 2020 7:13 pm

Beautiful walkthrough. It worked for me exactly as you so clearly laid out. I created an account just to tell you this is perfect!

I can now rip my 4K UHD Blurays! Yay!

My MakeMKV info after the flashes:
Drive Information
OS device name: F:
Manufacturer: HL-DT-ST
Product: BD-RE WH16NS40
Revision: 1.03
Serial number: KLBK36B1717
Firmware date: 2117-11-21 16:53
Bus encryption flags: 17
Highest AACS version: 63

LibreDrive Information
Status: Enabled
Drive platform: MT1959
Firmware type: Patched (microcode access re-enabled)
Firmware version: 1.03
DVD all regions: Yes
BD raw data read: Yes
BD raw metadata read: Yes
Unrestricted read speed: Yes

zink560
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2020 3:21 am

Re: WH16NS40 Flasher

Post by zink560 » Thu Sep 17, 2020 3:27 am

I made this account, just so I could thank you. Your post made it so easy to do this, it was a breeze (after reading about how hard it is to flash this drive). If someone buys this drive off of Amazon recently (like i did), this guide will definetly work. Thanks again!

Beast
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2020 2:31 am

Re: WH16NS40 Flasher

Post by Beast » Thu Sep 17, 2020 11:19 pm

Hi
I have the same drive and was wondering why you flashed 1.03, when HL-DT-ST-BD-RE_WH16NS40-NS50-1.05-NM00900-212005061440.bin is available in the latest firmware pack? https://www.makemkv.com/download/mk-fir ... 200720.zip

Drive Information
OS device name: F:
Manufacturer: HL-DT-ST
Product: BD-RE WH16NS40
Revision: 1.05
Serial number: XXXXXXXXX
Firmware date: 2120-05-06 14:40
Bus encryption flags: 17
Highest AACS version: 35

LibreDrive Information
Status: Enabled
Drive platform: MT1959

MartyMcNuts
Posts: 1013
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2017 11:45 pm

Re: WH16NS40 Flasher

Post by MartyMcNuts » Thu Sep 17, 2020 11:44 pm

Beast wrote:
Thu Sep 17, 2020 11:19 pm
Hi
I have the same drive and was wondering why you flashed 1.03, when HL-DT-ST-BD-RE_WH16NS40-NS50-1.05-NM00900-212005061440.bin is available in the latest firmware pack? https://www.makemkv.com/download/mk-fir ... 200720.zip

Drive Information
OS device name: F:
Manufacturer: HL-DT-ST
Product: BD-RE WH16NS40
Revision: 1.05
Serial number: XXXXXXXXX
Firmware date: 2120-05-06 14:40
Bus encryption flags: 17
Highest AACS version: 35

LibreDrive Information
Status: Enabled
Drive platform: MT1959
Because the latest firmware versions SUCK!!!! Really, the latest versions are NOT BETTER in any way.
Cheers :D
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For UHD capable drives in AUS & NZ: viewtopic.php?f=20&t=18747

SamuriHL
Posts: 1708
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 5:32 pm

Re: WH16NS40 Flasher

Post by SamuriHL » Fri Sep 18, 2020 1:12 am

But, But, it's a bigger number. It MUST be better! :D :roll: :lol:

d00zah
Posts: 746
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 8:23 pm

Re: WH16NS40 Flasher

Post by d00zah » Fri Sep 18, 2020 1:31 am

Then just wait until it goes to 11. :D

miba78
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2020 5:06 pm

Re: WH16NS40 Flasher

Post by miba78 » Sat Nov 21, 2020 5:32 pm

avenger09123 wrote:
Wed Jul 31, 2019 2:22 am
Download the zip below - open the flasher tool. Select the folder with the arrow in it and select the firmware that says 3.10 in the title. Flash it. Restart. Then flash the second firmware in it - which has the correct model name in it and is UHD friendly courtesy of our genius friends here in the forums.
Does this mean the downgrading is complete after flashing the second firmware (WH16NS40-NS50-1.03) on it or do you recommend to then downgrade further and flash either WH16NS40_1.02_NS50 or WH16NS60 1.02MK on it?
I have not fully understood if the second firmware "only" restores the capability to further downgrade or contains a 1.03 MK version which concludes the downgrading.
For example: https://www.makemkv.com/forum/viewtopic ... 16&t=19634 recommends
"Recommended Firmware to flash for MakeMKV:
WH16NS60 > WH16NS60 1.02MK
WH14NS40 > WH16NS60 1.02MK
WH16NS40 > WH16NS60 1.02MK
BH16NS55 > WH16NS60 1.02MK
..."

Billycar11
Posts: 1161
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2014 5:49 am

Re: WH16NS40 Flasher

Post by Billycar11 » Sat Nov 21, 2020 8:50 pm

miba78 wrote:
Sat Nov 21, 2020 5:32 pm
Does this mean the downgrading is complete after flashing the second firmware (WH16NS40-NS50-1.03) on it or do you recommend to then downgrade further and flash either WH16NS40_1.02_NS50 or WH16NS60 1.02MK on it?
I have not fully understood if the second firmware "only" restores the capability to further downgrade or contains a 1.03 MK version which concludes the downgrading.
For example: https://www.makemkv.com/forum/viewtopic ... 16&t=19634 recommends
"Recommended Firmware to flash for MakeMKV:
WH16NS60 > WH16NS60 1.02MK
WH14NS40 > WH16NS60 1.02MK
WH16NS40 > WH16NS60 1.02MK
BH16NS55 > WH16NS60 1.02MK
..."
please dont follow this guide
as my guide says flash Directly to WH16NS60 1.02MK if you meet all the other requirements this guide was never relevant.
https://www.makemkv.com/forum/viewtopic ... 16&t=19634

dandirk
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 10:39 pm

Re: WH16NS40 Flasher

Post by dandirk » Sun Nov 22, 2020 3:55 pm

MartyMcNuts wrote:
Thu Sep 17, 2020 11:44 pm

Because the latest firmware versions SUCK!!!! Really, the latest versions are NOT BETTER in any way.
Know this is the older thread but was looking into libredrive, and enabling...

Why do the newer versions suck? Specific behavior, error, or performance?

Would like to be informed to avoid potential issues in the future.

Billycar11
Posts: 1161
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2014 5:49 am

Re: WH16NS40 Flasher

Post by Billycar11 » Sun Nov 22, 2020 10:21 pm

dandirk wrote:
Sun Nov 22, 2020 3:55 pm
MartyMcNuts wrote:
Thu Sep 17, 2020 11:44 pm

Because the latest firmware versions SUCK!!!! Really, the latest versions are NOT BETTER in any way.
Know this is the older thread but was looking into libredrive, and enabling...

Why do the newer versions suck? Specific behavior, error, or performance?

Would like to be informed to avoid potential issues in the future.
Because encryption and harder to downgrade to a working firmware

Post Reply